In a pivotal decision, the United States Supreme Court has announced that it will not intervene in Donald Trump’s immunity case, allowing an appeals court to make the decision. This refusal heightens the probability of a delay in the trial concerning charges of interference in the 2020 elections. The anticipated consequence is an extension beyond the scheduled date of March 4.
United States Supreme Court Accelerates Case Transfer to Appeals
The Supreme Court’s decision places the fate of the case in the hands of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, which has set accelerated procedures. Trump’s appeal is expected to be filed this Saturday, with a deadline for the government’s response by December 30. Oral arguments are scheduled for January 9, with a potential Supreme Court appeal after the intermediate court issues its ruling.
Purchase your subscription to WSJ and The Economist for only $129!
Legal Conflicts Set to Dominate 2024
This immunity case is just one of many legal conflicts involving Trump that could shape the judicial agenda in 2024. Additionally, Trump plans to appeal the Colorado Supreme Court’s decision that excluded him from the ballot for his involvement in the post-election insurrection of 2020.
Packed Judicial Agenda
With criminal charges in Georgia and New York, along with civil actions related to his business operations, Trump faces a crowded judicial agenda in the coming months.
Special Prosecutor Urges Swift Supreme Court Action in Trump Case
In an uncommon move, Special Prosecutor Jack Smith urged the Supreme Court to expedite the case. He argued that waiting for the appeals court could potentially delay the trial beyond its scheduled start date. Trump’s lawyers objected, alleging a politically motivated push for a quick trial amid a presidential campaign.
Suspension of Pretrial Proceedings
U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan suspended pretrial proceedings in Trump’s case until resolving the appeal, keeping the legal community and the public anticipating further developments in this intriguing legal showdown.
Get a 70% discount on your Financial Times Digital subscription!